What were the strengths and weaknesses of the process used to develop the ELGs the first time?

Although the revision process is different from the initial development of ELGs-often less intense and more data driven-it is still important to plan carefully for the process. Start with a frank evaluation of the original development process-were there aspects of the process that worked well or didn't work? Who was involved and should they be involved this time? Who was "missing" that should be included? Based on these analyses, develop plans for how the revision process will be conducted.

Related Issues: